There is a feminist in Australia who actually says that it should be illegal for women to choose to be stay-at-home-mothers because it is bad for the economy and women's equal rights: http://www.foxnews.com/opinion/2017/03/24/should-it-be-illegal-to-be-stay-at-home-mom-why-feminists-are-so-frustrated.html
I am not a feminist.. I do believe that men are providers and protectors and women are caregivers. There is no job more important for a mother than making sure her children grow up mentally stable and healthy. Her second job is caring for herself and the others she loves in her life. Work can be third, but only if she has adequate extra time after caring of her family and herself.
...And this is why men are providers and protectors: it allows women to do their job without worry. When men stop providing, it breaks the entire system forcing women to work instead of caring for their children and others. Kids get raised by daycare instead of loving mothers. Just like baby formula is not the same as breastmilk, even the best daycare is not the same as growing up within the safety of familial love
Men and women are not the same. Both are capable, but each have different skills. There are exceptions to everything, but in general men are much better in the provider role and women are much better as the primary caregiver. When men stop taking pride in being the provider and protector, there are many more single mothers and fatherless homes.
Feminism is feminizing men, making them no longer respect their provider role, while teaching women that having a "purpose" through employment is is more important than their own children's upbringing. No wonder society keeps breaking down. No wonder so many kids spend their free time watching TV and playing violent video games. Many parents no longer parent because often they are more concerned with the money they make than the attention their child receives. Shameful, and the outcome is easily predictable when one cares to think about it.....
No comments:
Post a Comment